Not a strategy deck. These are the specific jobs your people do every week, and what each one looks like when we are done.
AI reads every report, posts what matches, and hands a person only the exceptions. Commission claims come back as a worklist with dollars on it, not as a feeling that something is missing.
The email is read, the attachment parsed, the parts matched to your catalog. A draft quote is waiting when your inside sales team opens the thread.
Quote-to-order is measured by product line, customer, rep firm and person. The follow-ups write themselves and land on the right person's screen each morning.
Your distributors and reps cross their own parts on your website and submit the quote request themselves. No other manufacturer in your category has this.
The rep pack builds itself from your data: their year, their territory, the specification funnel, the asks in both directions. Two weeks becomes an afternoon.
How your business actually works gets written down as AI procedures anyone can run. A new hire runs the same play the veteran runs, on day three.
Your team describes what they want in plain English and it is live in Flow that afternoon. Build them for your own people, or for the rep firms and distributors who sell for you.
Every role gets named workflows, written down, in production, with a person accountable for each. Adoption is measured, not hoped for.
Most fractional AI officers hand you a governance framework and a roadmap. This one hands you working software, and he has already seen your channel data.
Ryan Nokes
Fractional Chief AI Officer
Transformation fails when it lands on two people at the top. Everyone in the business walks away with workflows built for the job they actually do.
Every manufacturer has work no product will ever ship with: your processes, your channel, your quirks. We stand up Claude across your business, wire it to your data, and teach your people to build on it themselves.
Set up properly, connected to your Flow data, with access rules that make sense for a manufacturer.
The way your business runs a bid list, a channel review or a claim dispute, captured so anyone can run it.
Deploy them inside Flow where the data already is, or anywhere else you want them to live.
The recurring jobs run on a schedule and land as a draft or a task, ready for a person to approve.
What each rep firm is doing for you, what it is worth, and what you need from them, ready before the review.
What is automatic, what needs a human signature, what never leaves the building. Written down and agreed.
Month one is The Manufacturer Business Review, included. We load twenty-four months of your data and hand back the full picture, because you cannot transform work you cannot see.
You cannot automate a process you have not measured. The review tells us where your hours and your money actually go, so the first workflows we build are the ones worth the most. It also means your data is already in Flow, which makes going live a subscription decision rather than a migration project.
Phased, so you see something working early and nothing depends on a big-bang cutover.
Time with every role, not just the executives. What each person does all day, where the hours go, which jobs everybody dreads. In parallel you send your data in whatever shape it is in.
The Manufacturer Business Review, included. Twenty-four months loaded, 48 dashboards built, every data defect found and priced, and two hours with your leadership walking the findings.
Every process scored on hours, dollars and risk. You approve the order of work. Nothing gets built because it is fashionable.
Flow's AI turned on and configured on your data, plus Claude stood up across the business with your processes written as procedures. Real work, real people, measured adoption.
Hands-on sessions by role. By the end your team writes its own procedures and ships its own apps. That is the point. A capability that leaves when we do is not a transformation.
Standing time with your Chief AI Officer, the next workflows built, and a written read on what changed and what it was worth.
Because most of what a manufacturer needs is already built. Flow is the premier sales operations platform for the industrial supply chain, built for reps, manufacturers and distributors, and every capability below already exists in it. You are not paying anyone to build them. You are paying for somebody senior to set them up on your data and get your people actually using them.
The gap in this industry was never the software. It is that nobody senior ever sat down with a manufacturer and rebuilt the work around what the software can already do. That is the whole engagement, and it is why it costs what it costs.
Priced on the size of your business and the scope you want, never on hours. One call tells you the number.
Quoted after one call.
Scoped on headcount, product line count and how much you want built. No hourly billing, no change orders for asking a question.
A portion of the engagement fee is credited against your Flow subscription, so the work that proves the case also pays for the platform it runs on.
Because handing people a chatbot is not a transformation. What sticks is a specific job, rebuilt, with the tool wired into the data it needs, a person accountable for it, and adoption measured. We do that job by job, starting with the ones the review proves are worth the most.
No. We will not pretend we do this for our health: at the end your data is loaded and modelled, and a portion of the fee credits against a subscription. But the audit, the dashboards, the procedures, the training and the apps are yours whether or not you buy the platform.
That is the normal condition of this industry, not a failing of yours. Eighteen rep firms send eighteen formats and none of the part numbers match. We build a template per format, and the mess becomes one of the findings rather than a reason to wait.
They do not need to be. The whole point of this generation of AI is that the instruction is English. The training is built around the job each person does, not around the tool, and the first thing every person builds is something that saves them time that week.
Both, in that order of importance. Working software and working processes are the deliverable. The training exists so you can keep building after we leave, which is the only version of this that actually pays off.
A named senior person with standing time in your business every month, reachable between sessions, who owns the outcome. Not a shared inbox, not a rotating analyst, and not a junior consultant reading from a deck someone else wrote.
It replaces keying, chasing and re-typing. Manufacturers do not lose orders because they are short on data entry, they lose them because the quote went out two days late and nobody followed up. That is the work we are giving back to your people.
The people running your engagement and nobody else. Your data sits in your own tenancy. Nothing is pooled, benchmarked or shown to another manufacturer, and nothing leaves without you asking for it.
You keep everything: the dashboards, the matching file, the upload templates, the procedures, the apps and the policy. More importantly you keep people who know how to build the next one. If you want the standing time to continue it continues, but the design goal is that you do not need it to.
Smaller manufacturers usually get more out of it, because there is nobody on staff whose job is to think about this and every hour returned goes straight back to selling. Scope is set to your size.
Book a call. We will walk your company's situation, scope the engagement, and tell you what the first ninety days would look like.